The Cost-Efficiency Pillar: A Deep Dive into 4-Legged Towers for Multi-Operator 5G RAN Sharing
- 获取链接
- X
- 电子邮件
- 其他应用
The global rollout of 5G represents one of the most capital-intensive infrastructure projects of our time. For Mobile Network Operators (MNOs), the economics are clear: achieving ubiquitous coverage and capacity requires a fundamental shift from building proprietary, single-tenant towers to embracing shared infrastructure. In this shared ecosystem, the choice of physical support structure becomes a critical financial and operational decision. While sleek monopoles dominate urban streetscapes, the 4-legged angle steel lattice tower emerges as the unsung, cost-efficiency champion for multi-operator 5G Radio Access Network (RAN) sharing, offering an unbeatable Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) advantage for high-capacity sites.
This analysis goes beyond mere aesthetics to dissect the cost-benefit equation that makes the 4-legged tower the optimal host for shared 5G ambitions.
The Multi-Operator Imperative and the Load Challenge
5G RAN sharing—where multiple operators colocate their active (antennas, radios) or passive (tower, power, fiber) equipment on a single site—is a proven model for accelerating deployment and slashing costs by 30-40% per operator. However, this convergence creates unique structural demands:
Increased Weight: Modern 5G Massive MIMO antennas are significantly heavier and bulkier than 4G panels.
Aggregated Wind Load: Multiple large antennas from several operators present a substantial cumulative surface area for wind force.
Complex Siting: The ideal, high-value location for coverage often has space for only one structure, which must now serve all.
A monopole's single, tapered tube has practical limits in height and load capacity before requiring exponentially more steel and a massive foundation. The 4-legged tower, with its triangulated geometry, solves this through superior structural efficiency.
A Comparative Cost-Benefit Analysis: 4-Legged vs. Monopole
The true economy of the 4-legged tower is revealed through a lifecycle cost analysis across five key dimensions.
| Cost Dimension | 4-Legged Angle Steel Tower | Monopole (for equivalent load capacity) | Economic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Material & Fabrication | Uses standardized, high-strength angle steel. Open lattice design employs 20-30% less steel by mass for equivalent strength/height due to optimal load distribution. | Requires thick, rolled steel plates. Material use is less efficient for resisting complex bending moments from multi-sided loads. | Lower CAPEX. Significant savings on raw material, a major cost driver. |
| 2. Transportation & Logistics | Modular and compact. Components break down into standard-length angles and bracings, maximizing truckload capacity and minimizing special transport permits. | Oversized loads. Taller/heavier monopoles often require specialized trailers, police escorts, and route planning, adding cost and complexity. | Lower Logistics Cost. Easier, cheaper shipping to remote or logistically challenging sites. |
| 3. Foundation & Civil Works | Distributed load. Weight and overturning forces are spread across four separate footing points, requiring less massive individual concrete pours. | Concentrated load. All forces channel into one single, large-diameter foundation requiring deep excavation and significant reinforced concrete. | Lower Civil Works CAPEX. Can be the single largest site cost savings, especially in poor soil conditions. |
| 4. Installation & Scalability | Bolted assembly. Erection is methodical, using standard cranes. Platforms are easily added or reinforced at multiple levels to host new tenants or equipment. | Often welded or large-bolt connection. Requires larger cranes for single-piece lifts. Vertical real estate is fixed; adding significant new load often necessitates complete tower replacement. | Future-Proof & Flexible. Lower installation risk and cost for future expansion, protecting the shared asset's long-term value. |
| 5. Maintenance & Lifecycle | Hot-dip galvanized components provide 50+ year corrosion protection. Any single damaged member can be individually inspected and replaced if needed. | Also galvanized, but damage or corrosion to the single shaft can compromise the entire structure, potentially requiring a full wrap or costly sectional repair. | Lower OPEX & Risk. Ensures higher long-term structural integrity and easier, cheaper repairs. |
The Shared-Site Value Multiplier
The economic argument solidifies when applied to a multi-operator RAN sharing scenario. A single 4-legged tower, designed from the outset for heavy loads, can host three or four operators' full 5G suites (including backup microwave links) without future structural modification.
Cost Dilution: The tower's total capital cost is shared among all tenants. While the initial outlay for a heavy-duty 4-legged tower may be higher than a basic monopole, the per-operator cost plummets.
Accelerated Revenue: A tower that is "tenant-ready" avoids the 12-18 month delay of permitting and building a new structure for each new operator, allowing tower companies (TowerCos) or host MNOs to generate rental income faster.
Site Preservation: In coveted locations (e.g., a town's highest hill), one robust 4-legged tower preserves the asset for decades of technological evolution, avoiding the nightmare of trying to permit multiple towers in the same spot.
Conclusion: Investing in the Shared Future
The transition to 5G and beyond is not a sprint but a marathon. For network planners and TowerCos, the choice of infrastructure must be strategic, balancing today's needs with tomorrow's unknowns. The 4-legged angle steel tower is not merely a piece of steel; it is a strategic, cost-efficiency platform engineered for the shared future.
Its material efficiency, logistical simplicity, scalable design, and unparalleled load capacity translate directly into lower CAPEX, reduced OPEX, and higher long-term asset value. In the mission to deliver cost-effective, ubiquitous 5G coverage through RAN sharing, the 4-legged tower is not just an option—it is the most rational, economical, and future-proof pillar for success.
- 获取链接
- X
- 电子邮件
- 其他应用


.jpg)
评论
发表评论